The Debate

Should we retire the word "autism"? Articles and perspectives from researchers, clinicians, and advocates.

Autism Spectrum Heterogeneity: Fact or Artifact?

Pro-Reclassification

Mottron & Bherer, 2020 — Molecular Psychiatry. Argues the limitless variety of presentations under one diagnosis poorly serves intervention planning and research.

www.nature.com

Heterogeneity Thwarts Autism Explanatory Power: A Proposal for Endophenotypes

Pro-Reclassification

Siegel, 2022 — Frontiers in Psychiatry. Argues autism is not a unitary biological or clinical entity and proposes endophenotype-based reclassification.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Autism-ness Does Not Exist, but Autism Does: A Critic of the 'Spectrum' Position

Pro-Reclassification

Mottron et al., 2025 — Autism & Developmental Language Impairments. Argues the spectrum framework has diluted the diagnosis to near-meaninglessness and advocates for a categorical prototype.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A Radical Change in Our Autism Research Strategy Is Needed: Back to Prototypes

Pro-Reclassification

Mottron, 2021 — Autism Research. Calls for abandoning the spectrum approach in research in favor of prototypical autism definitions.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

An Overview of Autism Spectrum Disorder, Heterogeneity and Treatment Options

Pro-Reclassification

Lai et al., 2014 — Neuroscience Bulletin. Proposes reframing ASDs as 'the autisms' to account for multiple etiologies and distinct clinical entities.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Editorial: Is Autism a Biological Entity?

Pro-Reclassification

2023 — Frontiers in Psychiatry. Questions whether autism constitutes a valid biological category given the vast number of risk factors and lack of neurobiological validity.

www.frontiersin.org

From Heterogeneity to Idiosyncrasy in the Autistic Brain

Pro-Reclassification

2026 — Nature Mental Health. Argues heterogeneity is so extreme that each autistic brain may be unique, challenging the coherence of a single diagnostic category.

www.nature.com

Editorial Perspective: Neurodiversity — A Revolutionary Concept for Autism and Psychiatry

Pro-Unified Label

Baron-Cohen, 2017 — Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Argues autism reflects natural neurological variation, not disorder, and the label enables rights-based advocacy.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Shifting from 'Normal Science' to Neurodiversity in Autism Science

Pro-Unified Label

Pellicano & den Houting, 2022 — JCPP. Calls for autism research to center autistic perspectives and the neurodiversity paradigm.

acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality

Pro-Unified Label

Runswick-Cole et al., 2016 — Disability & Society. Examines how the autism label has become central to identity, community, and political mobilization.

www.tandfonline.com

Autistic Identity: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Research

Pro-Unified Label

Davies et al., 2024 — Autism Research. Finds positive autistic identity is associated with better mental health, supporting the value of the diagnostic label.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Autistic Self-Advocacy and the Neurodiversity Movement: Implications for Autism Early Intervention Research and Practice

Pro-Unified Label

Leadbitter et al., 2021 — Frontiers in Psychology. Argues the autistic community's self-advocacy depends on a shared identity under the autism label.

www.frontiersin.org

Diagnosis and Diversity: Feminism, Autistic Identity, and the Possibilities for Neurodiversity

Pro-Unified Label

Russell et al., 2025 — Autism in Adulthood. Draws parallels between feminist identity politics and autistic identity — the label is a tool for collective action.

journals.sagepub.com

Autism's Heterogeneity in Historical Perspective: From Challenge to Opportunity

Overview

2023 — Frontiers in Psychology. Historical overview of how autism's diversity has been framed as both a scientific challenge and an opportunity for reclassification.

www.frontiersin.org